Looking for Love in All the Wrong Places

All throughout my practice and over the years, for both couples and individuals, I see many who find themselves in difficult if not downright abusive relationships.  That has often been an ongoing pattern in their past relationships and their current relationship may continue and mirror those problems.  Also there are many who are still looking for just the ‘right’ person but haven’t a clue as to what makes a relationship ‘right’.  Now sometimes relationships become abusive after time and it can be because two people are not right for each other so that conflict and anger become part of the dynamic.  Or sometimes stresses destroy what was once good.  But more often it is a pattern.  Someone once said to me about her friend “I can always tell which kind of guy she will gravitate to.  She always goes for the one with a certain ‘attitude’ and of course good looking.  It is those guys who are really womanizers”.

More often it is women who find themselves with angry or emotionally unavailable men who take out their frustrations on their partners, but I have also worked with men who find themselves with cold, derisive, and ‘bitchy’ women who offer little warmth or love and mistreat them.  Now relationships don’t  normally start out that way.  People usually fancy themselves ‘in love’.  But the chemistry and that mystery we call ‘attraction’ can fade pretty quickly with the reality of life’s stressors.

There are many who repeat past patterns of abuse whether it stems from original family dynamics or from past relationships.  One person I worked with had a cold, distant, alcoholic mother, and every woman he ends up with has an addiction problem of some sort.  He takes care of them and does his best to offer them the love he feels in the hopes that it will change them.  I often feel that people have a certain kind of radar that puts them in the same situation over and over again.  The key to change is understanding the behavior and the willingness to stop trying again and again to accomplish what may be impossible.  Easier said than done!

 

Standard

Technology’s Influence on Psychotherapy

The age of technology is amazing.  From when I first started as a psychotherapist, it is a different world as regards information and communication.  I am definitely a fan of technology. However, as it is used in certain situations, it has a significant downside.

The internet offers a wealth of information on all sorts of issues related to mental health.  It gives people a better understanding of psychological problems from theoretical points of view.  You can also find tons of ‘how to’ literature on techniques to approach symptoms, solve and resolve problems.

But from my perspective there can be major problems with people jumping to conclusions from this information.  Like with medicine, they read and think they know what’s wrong.  They self-diagnose and may put off seeing someone until things have gotten much worse.

One of the most alarming outcomes of technology (in my opinion) is the use of social media – texting, tweeting & email etc., as a major means of interpersonal communication.  That is not to say that these communication methods don’t have their place.  For factual information such as when & where, it is great. But many use this instead of face to face interaction for more complex communication.

When you talk via text or email, there is no ability to get a ‘read’ on the other person.  There is no access to the nuances of body language such as eye contact or emotions that enhance communication in so many ways when you are face to face. For some this is helpful.  Many feel they can communicate better via the written word.  But mostly this leaves way too much room for miscommunication and misunderstanding.  It also prevents the experience of re-framing in the moment.  The internet doesn’t listen and is not a substitute for live interaction.

For very isolated people it can offer a means of contact and communication that they would otherwise not have.  I do not downplay the benefit for those who have difficulty communicating in interactive situations.  But it also can reinforce this avoidance.  People can manage their communications like they were writing a term paper.

Communication via the internet is intrinsically sterile.  When you think of children in institutions who have no one interacting with them physically and then compare that with parents who are always holding and playing & engaging in eye contact, the difference is monumental.  In institutions, the result can be a failure for the baby to thrive.

When I see people who get together but somehow always manage to spend time on their devices, I groan.  Think of a TV commercial – I think it’s for online gambling – where conversation is quickly replaced by individual game playing.  This is very different from interactive games and appears to be a new cultural trend.  Why is it necessary to always have the device handy?  I often feel it’s a subtle means of diluting the actual experience with friend, family or significant others.   Its effect is to interrupt the flow of the relationship.

In therapy, there are no devices and most turn them off unless there is an extraordinary circumstance.  The communication between therapist & patient is much more immediate and that lends itself to deeper understanding.  I see the person and can gain greater insight that way.  We have a relationship that can’t be duplicated online.   I hope that in the rest of life technology is not causing us to lose the gift of human presence.

Although the internet offers wonderful things, unfortunately it also offers new opportunities to indulge in addictions of all sorts.  It can be its own addiction.  It enables avoidance of the world and real life and real problems.  Just as with TV it can offer a respite from the stresses of life.  Great!  But it’s abuse tempts us all.

The internet has dramatically changed how people find medical & mental health providers.   You can look up anyone’s credentials and check out their reviews. That is amazing.  However it used to be that people got  personal recommendations.  Now I am not sure which is actually better.  But the internet as well as insurance companies have made finding a provider a much more anonymous endeavor.

Then there are the online support groups which I actually think of as pseudo-support.  They are anonymous, but unlike AA and similar groups, there is no actual emotional or even physical touching.  You don’t get to deal with trauma in person.  You may get lots of information & helpful hints, but the methodology itself reinforces the interpersonal disconnect.

In actual therapy sessions, and even as regards the reasons people seek treatment, I can’t say I have noticed that technology has affected much of what goes on or the problems people come in with.  What I have noticed is that different addictions are ‘easier’ to accommodate.  Infidelity is easier to hide and more and more people are looking for a mate using internet dating sites.  That has both up & down sides. In any case, the issues that confront couples and what makes relationship difficult are still the same.

I have concerns about how the younger generation is learning to relate or have relationships.  Technology is an essential part of children’s lives.  They see adults using devices and are growing up with them.  Hopefully they are also learning to relate in a more personal way.  I would hate to think we are losing something as important and valuable as human bonding which has always occurred naturally and without the interface of whatever new device comes down the pike.

 

 

 

 

Standard

The Changing Face of Psychotherapy

Many years ago when I first started out in the field it was not uncommon for people to be in psychoanalysis or psychotherapy 3 – 4 times per week.  These days someone coming even 2 times per week is rare.  This change is partly because of the intrusion of insurance into medical treatment of all kinds.  Insurance controls what services are reimbursed and the frequency of visits, tests, etc.  This is especially true for mental health services, often considered by many as the stepchild of medicine.  Few can afford to see a psychotherapist more than weekly.

We can blame insurance companies & say “they’re the culprits”.  Insurance companies are offering less and reimbursing less for services they do approve, making it harder to get needed mental health services.  But this change is also because of the availability of different forms of psychological treatment, including medication, the difficulty in providing studies which can ‘prove’ the efficacy of psychotherapy, and the evolving nature of our culture at large.

The popular culture has become one of ‘quick fixes’, a ‘just do it’ mentality, and one of instant gratification.  Medication has changed the way people deal with issues. They often look first to a pill to solve their problems.  I have said before that I believe in medication.   But it’s not the magic answer and it is not right for all.   Studies have shown that medication in combination with psychotherapy is most effective.  But just as important a factor is that people are less willing to ‘go deep’.  And I don’t know if that’s all negative.  Sometimes Cognitive Behavioral Therapy – CBT makes a dent and I use it.  But there is a vast difference between knowing something intellectually & have it filter down into emotional understanding.  There are many who know the right ways they should think but can’t make the switch even with workbooks and reminders.  Then there are those who don’t make the effort because of underlying issues that stand in the way.  Our quick fix society wants to believe that these things work, but in my experience they are an aid for some but definitely not for all.  Just like medication, there is no magic.  I often say that if there was a magic pill or if I had a magic wand I would use it & find another line of work.

My friend reminds me that readers today have very short attention spans – no more than a paragraph for a blog.  I don’t know if that’s true or not but, there is definitely a trend toward shortening all aspects of communication.  I don’t know if that is good or bad or just a fact of the modern world and our busy lives.  The jury is out.  But it has certainly affected the practice of psychotherapy from the time I began working.

Standard

Psychotherapy has an Image Problem

I saw this article in todays New York Times Op Ed section and found it interesting and informative.  See what you think.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/30/opinion/psychotherapys-image-problem.html?hp&_r=0

Standard